MacBook Pro M4 Max
A MacBook Pro M4 Max runs 34 of the 34 open models tracked here at Q4_K_M with 8k context, computed on 16 October 2026. The largest is Mistral Small 4 119B (MoE), needing 72.5 GB and generating at most 101 tokens per second.
- Memory
- 128 GB unified
- For the GPU
- 96 GB
- Bandwidth
- 546 GB/s
- Released
- 2024
- Availability
- Apple unified memory
Open the MacBook Pro M4 Max in the LLM checker
What a MacBook Pro M4 Max runs, model by model
MacBook Pro M4 Max (128 GB) addresses 96 GB (75% of its 128 GB of unified memory, the share macOS is observed to hand the GPU by default) at 546 GB/s. Every model below is at Q4_K_M with 8k of context, the setting most people actually use. Once the 5% safety margin comes off, the card has 91.2 GB to spend: memory decides what loads, bandwidth how fast it answers. Both are estimates from stated formulas, and the VRAM calculator shows the working.
On this card a model fits at or under 91.2 GB, and above 81.6 GB it is tight: it loads, but there is little left for the conversation, and a desktop on the same 128 GB can push it over. Tokens per second are single-stream estimates from memory bandwidth; ≤ marks a ceiling real runtimes fall well below.
Computed 16 October 2026One caveat specific to Apple silicon: these tokens-per-second figures describe generation, which unified memory handles well. Prompt processing (reading what you send before the first token comes back) is markedly slower than on an equivalent Nvidia card, and that is what you feel when you paste in a long document. Short prompts feel fast on this machine; 30,000-token ones do not.
The model to actually run on it
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B (MoE) is the best use of this card: 45.9 GB of the 96 GB available, an estimated 73 tokens per second, faster than you can read, and 131,072 tokens of context still available. It is a mixture-of-experts model, so all 74.9B parameters sit in memory but only 9B are read per token, which is why it is quick for its size.
How this is chosen, since no benchmark is quoted: models are compared by size, a mixture-of-experts model counting at the geometric mean of its total and active parameters (a rule of thumb, not a measurement). The pick is the biggest class that fits with memory to spare and answers at 25 tokens per second or better, and within that class the most recent general-purpose release; coding and reasoning specialists are listed above but not recommended by default.
Mistral Small 4 119B (MoE) is the largest model the card will hold, at 72.5 GB, with room for 131,072 tokens of context. It is a mixture-of-experts model reading only 6.5B parameters per token, so it is the faster of the two at an estimated 101 tokens per second; what it gives up is the depth of a dense model that reads all of its weights for every token.
If quality matters more than parameter count, Llama 3.3 70B fits at Q8_0 in about 81 GB. Q8 is near-lossless; a smaller model at Q8 often beats a larger one squeezed into Q3.
How much context actually fits
Model size is the question people ask; context is the one that bites. The KV cache grows linearly with the conversation, so a model that loads comfortably can still run out of memory halfway through a long document. On 96 GB, the context you get is whatever the weights leave behind, which is why two cards that run the same model can feel completely different in use. These are the largest contexts this card holds, at Q4_K_M weights.
| Model | Max context, FP16 KV | With Q8 KV cache |
|---|---|---|
| Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B (MoE) | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Llama 3.3 70B | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Qwen3 32B | 40,960 tokens · model limit | 40,960 tokens · model limit |
| Gemma 4 31B | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
Every model in this table already reaches its limit at FP16, so quantising the KV cache buys nothing here. Capped at 128k tokens, or at the model's own native window where that is smaller, marked "model limit": free memory beyond that point buys nothing. Rows that hold far more context than their size suggests are hybrid, sliding-window or latent-attention models, which cache only a fraction of what a standard transformer does; each model page shows the working.
Where this card stops
Nothing in this list is out of reach. Every model tracked here fits at Q4_K_M with 8k of context, so the ceiling you will meet is context length and batch size, not parameter count.
Buy or rent
If you were buying the laptop anyway, the memory upgrade is the cheapest large-model capacity in this list. If you were not, it is an expensive way to buy GPU memory.
What matters is the memory upgrade rather than the machine, and Apple prices that differently in every configuration. Put the figure you are actually looking at, with your electricity rate and your real monthly hours, into the build vs rent calculator. It returns the month owning becomes cheaper, or tells you it never does. Hours per month decides it far more often than the price does.
The honest take
A laptop that runs models a desktop GPU cannot hold.
A fully specified M4 Max carries up to 128 GB of unified memory, which fits a 70B model at Q4 with long context in a machine you can put in a bag. Bandwidth is 546 GB/s (around a 4070), so it is not fast, but it is fast enough for chat, and it runs on battery. The same prompt-processing caveat as every Apple machine applies.
What it is good at
- Up to 128 GB unified memory in a laptop: 70B at Q4 fits comfortably.
- Runs on battery, silently, without a desk or a power supply built around it.
- MLX takes good advantage of the hardware, and llama.cpp is well maintained on it.
What it is not
- 546 GB/s means large models generate slowly compared with a desktop card.
- Prompt processing lags Nvidia badly, which is felt most on long documents.
- No CUDA, so much of the image, video and fine-tuning ecosystem is unavailable.
The thing people get wrong: The same 75% default cap on GPU-addressable memory applies, so a 128 GB machine plans around roughly 96 GB. It is still more usable memory than any single consumer graphics card.
Compared with the alternatives
- Mac Studio M2 Ultra: 144 GB · 800 GB/s · best fit Muse Glimmer 30B at ~32 tok/s. The quiet way to hold a very large model, as long as you are patient with long prompts.
- RTX 4090: 24 GB · 1,008 GB/s · best fit Muse Glimmer 30B at ~41 tok/s. The card most local-model advice is implicitly written for.
- RTX 5090: 32 GB · 1,792 GB/s · best fit Muse Glimmer 30B at ~73 tok/s. The first consumer card whose memory bandwidth changes what is comfortable.
All 39 cards are compared side by side on the GPU index, and the same numbers from the model's point of view are on each model fit table. To check one specific pairing rather than read a table, use the can-I-run-it checker.
Questions
- Can a MacBook Pro M4 Max run a 70B model?
- Yes. Llama 3.3 70B at Q4_K_M with 8k of context needs about 45.8 GB, inside the 96 GB this card can address, and it generates an estimated 9 tokens per second, which is slow; fine for batch jobs.
- What is the best model to run on a MacBook Pro M4 Max?
- Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B (MoE). At Q4_K_M and 8k context it needs about 45.9 GB of the 96 GB available and generates an estimated 73 tokens per second, which is faster than you can read. If quality matters more than size, Llama 3.3 70B fits at Q8 in about 81 GB.
- How many tokens per second does a MacBook Pro M4 Max generate?
- It depends entirely on the size of the model, because generating a token means reading every active weight out of memory. At 546 GB/s and 70% efficiency, this card produces an estimated 82 tokens per second on an 8B model at Q4, and about 101 on the largest model it holds, Mistral Small 4 119B (MoE). Reading speed is roughly 5 to 8 words per second, so anything above 25 feels immediate. Treat 82 as a ceiling on 546 GB/s rather than a measurement; the higher a figure, the further real runtimes fall below it.
- Is 96 GB enough for running LLMs locally?
- It runs 34 of the 34 models tracked here at Q4_K_M with 8k of context, up to 119B parameters. The honest test is not the model list but the context: Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B-A9B (MoE) on this card holds about 131,072 tokens before memory runs out.
- MacBook Pro M4 Max or Mac Studio M2 Ultra for local models?
- The Mac Studio M2 Ultra holds more: 144 GB against 96 GB, but both run all 34 of these models at Q4_K_M with 8k of context, so the extra memory goes to longer context and higher precision. On speed, the Mac Studio M2 Ultra is faster: 800 GB/s against 546 GB/s, and bandwidth is what sets chat speed.
- Can a MacBook Pro run a 70B model?
- A 128 GB M4 Max can, at Q4, with a long context, on battery. Generation is slower than a desktop card at 546 GB/s, and long prompts take a visible pause before the first token.
- How much memory should I buy in a MacBook Pro for AI?
- The GPU gets about 75% of whatever you buy, so 36 GB leaves roughly 27 GB, enough for 32B-class models. 64 GB leaves about 48 GB, and 128 GB leaves about 96 GB, which is where 70B models become comfortable. Memory cannot be upgraded later, so it is the one decision worth over-buying.
- Memory: weights (parameters × bytes per parameter) + KV cache (2 × layers × KV heads × head dim × context × bytes for a standard transformer; sliding-window, hybrid and latent-attention models counted as they actually cache) + 0.5 GB runtime + 4% of weights. Full derivation in the VRAM calculator.
- Speed: 70% × bandwidth ÷ active weight bytes, single stream, no batching, prompt processing excluded. A ceiling, not a measurement: the 11 of 34 figures marked ≤ are where real runtimes fall furthest below the number, because so few weights are read per token. See the tokens-per-second estimator.
- Card specification (manufacturer figures): 128 GB, 546 GB/s; see Apple's own page for this machine. Apple unified memory: Apple publishes no GPU share; macOS's Metal limit is observed at about 75% of RAM on large-memory Macs, and every figure here uses that share.
- Model architecture values come from each model's published config; the self-hosted LLM guide explains what each one changes.