RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell

An RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell runs 28 of the 34 open models tracked here at Q4_K_M with 8k context, computed on 16 October 2026. The largest is Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (MoE), needing 22.4 GB and generating at most 270 tokens per second.

Updated

Memory
24 GB VRAM
Bandwidth
672 GB/s
Board power
145 W
Released
2025
Availability
Workstation card
What it runs
28 of 34 models
At Q4_K_M with 8k context. The largest it holds is Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (MoE): 22.4 GB, at most 270 tokens per second.
Computed 16 October 2026
Best model to run
Muse Glimmer 30B
18.7 GB of 24 GB, about 27 tokens per second: comfortable for chat. Picked as the biggest class of model that fits with room to spare and answers at 25 tokens per second or faster, then the newest release in it.
Computed 16 October 2026

Open the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell in the LLM checker

What an RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell runs, model by model

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell (24 GB) addresses 24 GB at 672 GB/s. Every model below is at Q4_K_M with 8k of context, the setting most people actually use. Once the 5% safety margin comes off, the card has 22.8 GB to spend: memory decides what loads, bandwidth how fast it answers. Both are estimates from stated formulas, and the VRAM calculator shows the working.

On this card a model fits at or under 22.8 GB, and above 20.4 GB it is tight: it loads, but there is little left for the conversation, and a desktop on the same 24 GB can push it over. Tokens per second are single-stream estimates from memory bandwidth; ≤ marks a ceiling real runtimes fall well below.

Computed 16 October 2026

The model to actually run on it

Muse Glimmer 30B is the best use of this card: 18.7 GB of the 24 GB available, an estimated 27 tokens per second, comfortable for chat, and 131,072 tokens of context still available.

How this is chosen, since no benchmark is quoted: models are compared by size, a mixture-of-experts model counting at the geometric mean of its total and active parameters (a rule of thumb, not a measurement). The pick is the biggest class that fits with memory to spare and answers at 25 tokens per second or better, and within that class the most recent general-purpose release; coding and reasoning specialists are listed above but not recommended by default.

Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (MoE) is the largest model the card will hold, at 22.4 GB, but it is the wrong daily driver: filling 93% of memory leaves room for only 25,600 tokens of conversation. More parameters are not worth a context window that runs out mid-document. It is a mixture-of-experts model reading only 3B parameters per token, so it is the faster of the two at an estimated 270 tokens per second; what it gives up is the depth of a dense model that reads all of its weights for every token.

If quality matters more than parameter count, Gemma 4 12B fits at Q8_0 in about 14.2 GB. Q8 is near-lossless; a smaller model at Q8 often beats a larger one squeezed into Q3.

How much context actually fits

Model size is the question people ask; context is the one that bites. The KV cache grows linearly with the conversation, so a model that loads comfortably can still run out of memory halfway through a long document. On 24 GB, the context you get is whatever the weights leave behind, which is why two cards that run the same model can feel completely different in use. These are the largest contexts this card holds, at Q4_K_M weights.

ModelMax context, FP16 KVWith Q8 KV cache
Muse Glimmer 30B 131,072 tokens 131,072 tokens
Qwen3 32B 9,216 tokens 18,432 tokens
Gemma 4 31B 30,720 tokens 72,704 tokens
Granite 4.2 30B 17,408 tokens 34,816 tokens

Quantising the KV cache to Q8 roughly doubles what you can hold, at a quality cost most people never notice: Qwen3 32B on this card goes from 9,216 to 18,432 tokens. Capped at 128k tokens, or at the model's own native window where that is smaller, marked "model limit": free memory beyond that point buys nothing. Rows that hold far more context than their size suggests are hybrid, sliding-window or latent-attention models, which cache only a fraction of what a standard transformer does; each model page shows the working.

Computed 16 October 2026

Where this card stops

The first model out of reach is Llama 3.3 70B: about 45.8 GB at Q4_K_M and 8k context, against 24 GB of usable memory. Dropping to Q3_K_M would need about 37.7 GB, which still does not fit. Offloading the remainder to system RAM works and is ten to fifty times slower; it is a way to see a model run, not a way to use one.

Buy or rent

Worth it when the slot, the power draw or ECC is the constraint. Without those limits, a 24 GB consumer card reads memory faster. For anything above 24 GB, renting a larger card for the hours you need it is the alternative to buying a second one.

Workstation cards are sold on quotes rather than shelf prices, so there is no single number to publish. Put the figure you are actually looking at, with your electricity rate and your real monthly hours, into the build vs rent calculator, which already knows this card draws 145 W under load. It returns the month owning becomes cheaper, or tells you it never does. Hours per month decides it far more often than the price does.

The honest take

Twenty-four gigabytes on a single-slot, 145 W workstation card.

It holds what any 24 GB card holds, so its model list is a 4090's. It reads that memory at 672 GB/s, two thirds of a 4090's 1,008, so the same model has a speed ceiling a third lower. What it gives back is a single slot, 145 W and ECC memory, which is why it turns up in compact workstations and rented servers rather than gaming PCs. It is a Blackwell card, so it runs the new FP4 formats natively.

What it is good at

  • A single slot at 145 W: several fit in one workstation without a special power supply.
  • ECC memory, which matters more for long unattended jobs than for chat.
  • Blackwell generation, so FP4 weight formats run natively.

What it is not

  • 672 GB/s is two thirds of a 4090: for the same model, the speed ceiling is a third lower.
  • Twenty-four gigabytes is the same ceiling as a 3090 or 4090: a 70B model at Q4 needs nearly twice that.
  • Priced as professional hardware. The money buys the slot, the power figure and ECC, not capacity.

The thing people get wrong: There are two RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell cards. This one reads 672 GB/s at 145 W; the SFF Edition has the same 24 GB but reads 432 GB/s at 70 W. A spec sheet that says only "RTX PRO 4000" does not tell you which, so check the bandwidth.

Compared with the alternatives

  • RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF: 24 GB · 432 GB/s · best fit Gemma 4 12B at ~43 tok/s. Twenty-four gigabytes at 70 W in a small card, the kind built into compact AI boxes.
  • RTX 4090: 24 GB · 1,008 GB/s · best fit Muse Glimmer 30B at ~41 tok/s. The card most local-model advice is implicitly written for.
  • RTX 3090: 24 GB · 936 GB/s · best fit Muse Glimmer 30B at ~38 tok/s. The value benchmark for local models, and it has been for years.

All 39 cards are compared side by side on the GPU index, and the same numbers from the model's point of view are on each model fit table. To check one specific pairing rather than read a table, use the can-I-run-it checker.

Questions

Can an RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell run a 70B model?
Not at Q4_K_M in one card. Llama 3.3 70B needs about 45.8 GB at 8k context and this card can address 24 GB. Your options are a smaller model, a harsher quantisation with very little context, splitting across two cards, or renting a larger one for the hours you need it.
What is the best model to run on an RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell?
Muse Glimmer 30B. At Q4_K_M and 8k context it needs about 18.7 GB of the 24 GB available and generates an estimated 27 tokens per second, which is comfortable for chat. If quality matters more than size, Gemma 4 12B fits at Q8 in about 14.2 GB.
How many tokens per second does an RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell generate?
It depends entirely on the size of the model, because generating a token means reading every active weight out of memory. At 672 GB/s and 70% efficiency, this card produces an estimated 101 tokens per second on an 8B model at Q4, and about 270 on the largest model it holds, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (MoE). Reading speed is roughly 5 to 8 words per second, so anything above 25 feels immediate. Treat 101 as a ceiling on 672 GB/s rather than a measurement; the higher a figure, the further real runtimes fall below it.
Is 24 GB enough for running LLMs locally?
It runs 28 of the 34 models tracked here at Q4_K_M with 8k of context, up to 36B parameters. The honest test is not the model list but the context: Muse Glimmer 30B on this card holds about 131,072 tokens before memory runs out.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF for local models?
Both address about the same memory, so they run the same models. On speed, this card is faster: 672 GB/s against 432 GB/s, and bandwidth is what sets chat speed.
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell or RTX 4090 for local LLMs?
Both hold 24 GB, so they run the same models at the same settings. The 4090 reads memory at 1,008 GB/s against 672 GB/s, so its speed ceiling is half again higher. The PRO 4000 draws 145 W against 450 W, takes one slot and has ECC memory.
What is the difference between the RTX PRO 4000 and the RTX PRO 4000 SFF?
The memory is the same, 24 GB of GDDR7 with ECC. The full card reads it at 672 GB/s and draws 145 W; the SFF Edition reads it at 432 GB/s and draws 70 W, in a smaller card. The same models fit on both, and the full card's speed ceiling is about one and a half times the SFF's.
  • Memory: weights (parameters × bytes per parameter) + KV cache (2 × layers × KV heads × head dim × context × bytes for a standard transformer; sliding-window, hybrid and latent-attention models counted as they actually cache) + 0.5 GB runtime + 4% of weights. Full derivation in the VRAM calculator.
  • Speed: 70% × bandwidth ÷ active weight bytes, single stream, no batching, prompt processing excluded. A ceiling, not a measurement: the 9 of 28 figures marked ≤ are where real runtimes fall furthest below the number, because so few weights are read per token. See the tokens-per-second estimator.
  • Card specification (manufacturer figures): 24 GB, 672 GB/s, 145 W; see NVIDIA's own page for this card.
  • Model architecture values come from each model's published config; the self-hosted LLM guide explains what each one changes.