RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell
An RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell runs 28 of the 34 open models tracked here at Q4_K_M with 8k context, computed on 16 October 2026. The largest is Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (MoE), needing 22.4 GB and generating at most 360 tokens per second.
- Memory
- 32 GB VRAM
- Bandwidth
- 896 GB/s
- Board power
- 200 W
- Released
- 2025
- Availability
- Workstation card
Open the RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell in the LLM checker
What an RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell runs, model by model
RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell (32 GB) addresses 32 GB at 896 GB/s. Every model below is at Q4_K_M with 8k of context, the setting most people actually use. Once the 5% safety margin comes off, the card has 30.4 GB to spend: memory decides what loads, bandwidth how fast it answers. Both are estimates from stated formulas, and the VRAM calculator shows the working.
On this card a model fits at or under 30.4 GB, and above 27.2 GB it is tight: it loads, but there is little left for the conversation, and a desktop on the same 32 GB can push it over. Tokens per second are single-stream estimates from memory bandwidth; ≤ marks a ceiling real runtimes fall well below.
Computed 16 October 2026The model to actually run on it
Muse Glimmer 30B is the best use of this card: 18.7 GB of the 32 GB available, an estimated 36 tokens per second, comfortable for chat, and 131,072 tokens of context still available.
How this is chosen, since no benchmark is quoted: models are compared by size, a mixture-of-experts model counting at the geometric mean of its total and active parameters (a rule of thumb, not a measurement). The pick is the biggest class that fits with memory to spare and answers at 25 tokens per second or better, and within that class the most recent general-purpose release; coding and reasoning specialists are listed above but not recommended by default.
Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (MoE) is the largest model the card will hold, at 22.4 GB, with room for 131,072 tokens of context. It is a mixture-of-experts model reading only 3B parameters per token, so it is the faster of the two at an estimated 360 tokens per second; what it gives up is the depth of a dense model that reads all of its weights for every token.
If quality matters more than parameter count, Mistral Small 3.1 24B fits at Q8_0 in about 28.3 GB. Q8 is near-lossless; a smaller model at Q8 often beats a larger one squeezed into Q3.
How much context actually fits
Model size is the question people ask; context is the one that bites. The KV cache grows linearly with the conversation, so a model that loads comfortably can still run out of memory halfway through a long document. On 32 GB, the context you get is whatever the weights leave behind, which is why two cards that run the same model can feel completely different in use. These are the largest contexts this card holds, at Q4_K_M weights.
| Model | Max context, FP16 KV | With Q8 KV cache |
|---|---|---|
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Qwen3 32B | 37,888 tokens | 40,960 tokens · model limit |
| Gemma 4 31B | 123,904 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Granite 4.2 30B | 46,080 tokens | 93,184 tokens |
Quantising the KV cache to Q8 roughly doubles what you can hold, at a quality cost most people never notice: Gemma 4 31B on this card goes from 123,904 to 131,072 tokens. Capped at 128k tokens, or at the model's own native window where that is smaller, marked "model limit": free memory beyond that point buys nothing. Rows that hold far more context than their size suggests are hybrid, sliding-window or latent-attention models, which cache only a fraction of what a standard transformer does; each model page shows the working.
Where this card stops
The first model out of reach is Llama 3.3 70B: about 45.8 GB at Q4_K_M and 8k context, against 32 GB of usable memory. Dropping to Q3_K_M would need about 37.7 GB, which still does not fit. Offloading the remainder to system RAM works and is ten to fifty times slower; it is a way to see a model run, not a way to use one.
Buy or rent
Worth it when power or ECC is the constraint, for example several cards in one workstation. Without those limits a 5090 holds the same 32 GB and reads it twice as fast. For bigger models, renting a larger card for the hours you need it is the alternative to buying a second one.
Workstation cards are sold on quotes rather than shelf prices, so there is no single number to publish. Put the figure you are actually looking at, with your electricity rate and your real monthly hours, into the build vs rent calculator, which already knows this card draws 200 W under load. It returns the month owning becomes cheaper, or tells you it never does. Hours per month decides it far more often than the price does.
The honest take
A 5090's 32 GB at half its bandwidth, in a two-slot, 200 W card.
It holds what a 5090 holds, 32 GB, with ECC, and reads it at 896 GB/s, exactly half the 5090's 1,792 GB/s. So the same models fit and each has half the speed ceiling. What it gives back is 200 W against 575 W, which suits workstations with several GPUs rather than single-card speed. It is a Blackwell card: FP4 runs natively and old software builds will not use it.
What it is good at
- 32 GB with ECC at 200 W, against the 5090's 575 W.
- A two-slot card: several fit in one workstation.
- Blackwell generation, so FP4 weight formats run natively.
What it is not
- 896 GB/s is half a 5090's: the same model has half the speed ceiling.
- The same 896 GB/s as the 16 GB 5070 Ti: what it adds is capacity, ECC and a lower power figure, not speed.
- Blackwell needs CUDA 12.8 or newer builds of PyTorch and llama.cpp; an old install will not use the card.
The thing people get wrong: It reads memory at exactly the 5070 Ti's 896 GB/s and exactly half the 5090's 1,792 GB/s. On a model that fits all three it generates like a 5070 Ti; on a model that needs 32 GB, a 5090 is twice as fast.
Compared with the alternatives
- RTX 5090: 32 GB · 1,792 GB/s · best fit Muse Glimmer 30B at ~73 tok/s. The first consumer card whose memory bandwidth changes what is comfortable.
- RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell: 24 GB · 672 GB/s · best fit Muse Glimmer 30B at ~27 tok/s. Twenty-four gigabytes on a single-slot, 145 W workstation card.
- Radeon AI PRO R9700: 32 GB · 640 GB/s · best fit Muse Glimmer 30B at ~26 tok/s. AMD's 32 GB workstation card: RX 9070 XT bandwidth with twice the memory, at 300 W.
All 39 cards are compared side by side on the GPU index, and the same numbers from the model's point of view are on each model fit table. To check one specific pairing rather than read a table, use the can-I-run-it checker.
Questions
- Can an RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell run a 70B model?
- Not at Q4_K_M in one card. Llama 3.3 70B needs about 45.8 GB at 8k context and this card can address 32 GB. Your options are a smaller model, a harsher quantisation with very little context, splitting across two cards, or renting a larger one for the hours you need it.
- What is the best model to run on an RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell?
- Muse Glimmer 30B. At Q4_K_M and 8k context it needs about 18.7 GB of the 32 GB available and generates an estimated 36 tokens per second, which is comfortable for chat. If quality matters more than size, Mistral Small 3.1 24B fits at Q8 in about 28.3 GB.
- How many tokens per second does an RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell generate?
- It depends entirely on the size of the model, because generating a token means reading every active weight out of memory. At 896 GB/s and 70% efficiency, this card produces an estimated 135 tokens per second on an 8B model at Q4, and about 360 on the largest model it holds, Qwen3.6 35B-A3B (MoE). Reading speed is roughly 5 to 8 words per second, so anything above 25 feels immediate. Treat 135 as a ceiling on 896 GB/s rather than a measurement; the higher a figure, the further real runtimes fall below it.
- Is 32 GB enough for running LLMs locally?
- It runs 28 of the 34 models tracked here at Q4_K_M with 8k of context, up to 36B parameters. The honest test is not the model list but the context: Muse Glimmer 30B on this card holds about 131,072 tokens before memory runs out.
- RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell or RTX 5090 for local models?
- Both address about the same memory, so they run the same models. On speed, the RTX 5090 is faster: 1,792 GB/s against 896 GB/s, and bandwidth is what sets chat speed.
- RTX PRO 4500 or RTX 5090 for AI?
- Both hold 32 GB, so the same models fit. The 5090 reads memory at 1,792 GB/s against 896 GB/s, twice as fast, so its speed ceiling is double on every model. The PRO 4500 draws 200 W against 575 W and has ECC memory. For one card and speed, the 5090; for several cards in one machine, or a power limit, the PRO 4500.
- RTX PRO 4500 or RTX PRO 4000?
- The PRO 4500 holds 32 GB against 24 GB and reads it at 896 GB/s against 672 GB/s, a third faster. The PRO 4000 is a single-slot card at 145 W; the PRO 4500 takes two slots at 200 W. If your models fit in 24 GB and space is tight, the PRO 4000; otherwise the PRO 4500 holds more and reads it faster.
- Memory: weights (parameters × bytes per parameter) + KV cache (2 × layers × KV heads × head dim × context × bytes for a standard transformer; sliding-window, hybrid and latent-attention models counted as they actually cache) + 0.5 GB runtime + 4% of weights. Full derivation in the VRAM calculator.
- Speed: 70% × bandwidth ÷ active weight bytes, single stream, no batching, prompt processing excluded. A ceiling, not a measurement: the 12 of 28 figures marked ≤ are where real runtimes fall furthest below the number, because so few weights are read per token. See the tokens-per-second estimator.
- Card specification (manufacturer figures): 32 GB, 896 GB/s, 200 W; see NVIDIA's own page for this card.
- Model architecture values come from each model's published config; the self-hosted LLM guide explains what each one changes.